>> TB: So HTML WG SHOULD use XLink for XHTML 2.0 >> unless there is substantial technical reason >> why not. > > That certainly doesn't seem to follow given the understanding of the > issues expressed above, unless it was decision made through exhausted > attrition? Only one individual seemed to be asserting this position > strongly throughout. That is because Ian is a person, not an audio-video camera. The minutes reflect the major points discussed at the meeting, not every word that every person said. ....RoyReceived on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 17:40:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:43 GMT