Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF

>>>Tim Bray said:
> 
> Jonathan Borden wrote:
> 
> > whoops, we forgot the related resource, let's call this "rddl:related":
> 
> Er JB, for the noobs, how is this RDF?  I see no RDF namespace anywhere? 

I'd have a hard time seeing how a system could recognise this was
RDF/XML in some form too.  There is no <rdf:RDF> block anywhere as a
clue even.  I doubt you'd use a MIME type to signify it either, since
it is intended to be text/html I expect.

Dave