W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2002

Re: minor RDF tax was: Re: RDDL/RDF

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:55:41 +0000
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
cc: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <12755.1037703341@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>Tim Bray said:
> 
> Jonathan Borden wrote:
> 
> > whoops, we forgot the related resource, let's call this "rddl:related":
> 
> Er JB, for the noobs, how is this RDF?  I see no RDF namespace anywhere? 

I'd have a hard time seeing how a system could recognise this was
RDF/XML in some form too.  There is no <rdf:RDF> block anywhere as a
clue even.  I doubt you'd use a MIME type to signify it either, since
it is intended to be text/html I expect.

Dave
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 05:57:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:12 GMT