RDDL: Here is some 'real' RDF was: Re: minor RDF tax from Jonathan Borden on 2002-11-17 (www-tag@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:59:03 -0500
To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <014501c28e73$c77aeb20$7c674544@ne.mediaone.net>

> Jonathan Borden wrote:
>
> > whoops, we forgot the related resource, let's call this "rddl:related":
>
> Er JB, for the noobs, how is this RDF?  I see no RDF namespace anywhere?
> -Tim
>

Take a look at this example: http://www.rddl.org/RDDL2-example.html

It browses and is legal RDF, so the decisions left are:

which root element <rdf:RDF> or <html:html> ?
Do we want RDDL to be legal XHTML that contains RDF snippets or legal RDF
that is browsable? (browsers as you know are quite forgiving).

Jonathan

Received on Sunday, 17 November 2002 15:19:03 UTC