- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:04:49 +0000
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- cc: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>, WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>
>>>Tim Bray said: <snip/> > What else would you need? -Tim A charter to the RDF Core WG that didn't say: [[The RDF Core WG is neither chartered to develop a new RDF syntax, ...] -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCoreWGCharter :) Sometime after the work on clarifying RDF/XML is done, trying obviously tripular XML syntaxes makes sense. I've some ideas here too - in particular a requirement for me would be something that can be easily written by XSLT. The main fault of RDF/XML is that it doesn't clearly show the triples. Dave
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 14:06:48 UTC