Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > > Dear www-tag, > > Issue fragmentInXML-28 [1] was been accepted by the TAG at their > 28 Oct 2002 teleconference [2]. > > Do fragment identifiers refer to a syntactice element (at least for XML > content), or can they refer to abstractions? > > Example from 17.2.2 SVG fragment identifiers: > > MyDrawing.svg#svgView(viewBox(0,200,1000,1000)) another example: home.xfm#frames(a=one.xhtml,b=two.xhtml,c=three.xhtml) As an old Grover, I am disconcerted by the use of fragment identifiers for: * display view specification (as in XFrames and SVG) * transformational processes (like the fragid-to-trigger XInclude proposal) * leaping from the domain of protocol and syntax to abstraction (as in many RDF examples) It seems to me that the poor #-sign is a hammer and everyone sees it as the tool for hammering their favourite nail. Paul PrescodReceived on Monday, 4 November 2002 19:21:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:44 GMT