Re: [Agenda] 3 June TAG teleconference (charmodReview-17, URIEquivalence-15)

On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 12:52, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
[...]
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/03-tag

In preparing for the meeting, I find it awkward
to have the action and homework stuff out of context
of the agenda items. I have been confused
by it during meetings in the past as well.

I like the way Paul Grosso organizes XML Core
WG agendas: action items are tucked under
relevant agenda items, rather than trying
to separate discussion of the status of
an action from the substance of it.

So I edited the agenda, putting them in context.
  $Date: 2002/05/31 17:40:57 $ 

I hope folks find this to be an improvement.

I was careful not to make any substantive changes
to the agenda.

(I like the bit in Brian McBride's RDF Core
agendas where he puts action items
that are (a) obviously done and (b) don't
relate to agenda items to be discussed,
in one big "confirm status of completed actions"
item, which doesn't take any telcon time
other than "any objections? hearing none,
so ordered". But I didn't see any actions
of that sort for this meeting).

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/