W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2002

Re: [uriMediaType-9] New Internet Draft: Resrep Type

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:04:30 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020327220412.03895820@joy.songbird.com>
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
Cc: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
At 08:50 PM 3/27/02 +0000, Sean B. Palmer wrote:
>OTOH, "Repr-Type" for Content-features is an interesting
>prospect. Graham, you listed one of the advantages as
>"administratively and politically easier to achieve", but I
>actually can't work out what the registration process for new
>headers is from the RFC. I presume that they're just defined in
>RFCs, as for any normal HTTP header, so why would registering it
>as a content-feature header be a path of less resistance?

See RFC 2506.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2002 03:09:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:05 GMT