On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 11:22, Mark Nottingham wrote: > It also seems perilously close to violating this constraint; > > > The TAG's scope is limited to technical issues about Web architecture. > > The TAG should not consider administrative, process, or organizational > > policy issues of W3C, which are generally addressed by the W3C Advisory > > Committee, Advisory Board, and Team. If the defintion is procedurally unconstrainable, I'd suggest not defining Web at all. Just start with Web Architecture and let it be. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.comReceived on Friday, 22 March 2002 11:38:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:40 GMT