"Roy T. Fielding" wrote: > >... > > It wouldn't be less useful. The point is that it would gain nothing > from doing so. It is a store and forward messaging system -- the application > consists of delivering the message, that's all. If you were tasked with inventing a protocol for fetching mail from a remote server, would you choose to make it a specialization of HTTP or not? I'm not asking whether there is sufficient cost/benefit to replace POP, IMAP, etc. Probably there is not. I'm asking how you decide when to invent a new application protocol or just use HTTP. Paul PrescodReceived on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 00:12:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:40 GMT