I find it somewhat bizarre that the section on "Protocols" in this W3C "document" does not even mention XML Protocol. Is this intentional? (It would be ok to say this is out of scope.) Jean-Jacques. David Orchard wrote: > I've reviewed the 0607 draft [1] and have the following comments: > > - I'd like to see the texts that have been written on shared information > space and REST incorporated into the document. > > - Aren't there other sections that have been written by TAG members that > could be incorporated? > > - Section 1.3, the 2nd and 3rd requirements incorrectly point to TAG issue > #8. TAG issue #8 is different and unrelated to these requirements. > > - Chapter 2, "Use XML": What does that mean? Does that mean XML 1.0, XML > 1.0 + Schema, the infoset, any or all of the preceeding? Seems like the web > architecture document, that includes XML, ought to have some more explicit > description of which portions of XML to use. > > - Appendix A1.1, the "Note on canonical form of URIs:" is incorrect I > believe. This is an issue currently before the tag. > > Cheers, > Dave > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0607-introReceived on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 03:38:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:51 GMT