- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 22:43:07 -0400
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:55:57AM -0700, David Orchard wrote: > One of the interesting places this might lead us, is that if we think that > there should be typing available for the GET query string, I'm not sure that > it's a WSD problem. Seems like mapping Schema to url-encoded nvp is more > general than wsd. IMO, this is most definitely a WSDL problem. HTML forms are currently more capable than WSDL here; they have a type system[1], and a means to bind those types to field names. I don't think it's appropriate to put type information in the URI because the URI is opaque to the client. If the client is constructing a URI, it should only be because the server told it how, with a form. And in that case, the server already knows the types. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/sgml/dtd.html#InputType MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 22:32:58 UTC