On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 15:51, Tim Bray wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > > >>Source: email from TB. Accepted as > >>augmentedInfoset-22. > > > > > > Yes, we later accepted the issue; so I think > > my action item was overtaken by events. > > Perhaps, but it feels like a no-brainer that a first step ought to be > getting on the Schema WG's radar so we can get some dialogue happening. Yes, I figured doing some sort of heads-up anyway was worthwhile, so I did... * validation design really supported by typing requirements? Dan Connolly (Tue, Jun 18 2002) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0166.html > Query similarly, but we can assume they're in the loop due to Paul's > roles. Er, are any TAG members on schema? -Tim -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2002 17:10:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:52:36 GMT