Agreeing with the notion that validation and type augmentation can/should be decoupled, what is wrong with the notion of pluggable types other than creating yetAnotherPossiblyUnpredictableComponent? len -----Original Message----- From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com] On further consideration, I probably would back off my statement above; for example, it seems just fine to refer to the XMl schema basic type repertoire (or hopefully, a subset of it) by reference. The problem that worries me here is where typing information comes from, and the supposition that types exist only as a side-effect of validation processing. -TimReceived on Thursday, 13 June 2002 14:12:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:51 GMT