W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2002

RE: Potential new issue: PSVI considered harmful

From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:20:00 -0700
Message-ID: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C10576C6C4@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>

> 1. Type-augmented XML is a good thing and a recommendation should be
> prepared describing it both at the infoset and syntax level. (I gather

Type-augmented XML needs a type system.  Which are you recommending?
A) Single spec, which uses one existing type system (XSD, WebOnt, XDR,
RDFS, etc.)
B) One spec for each
C) Single spec that combines many existing type systems
D) Yet another type system

> 4. Work on XQuery and other things that require a Type-Augmented
> must not depend on schema processing, and should not have normative
> linkages to any schema language specifications.

Are you saying that the XQuery type-augmented infoset should be in a
separate spec (which might have normative linkage to XSD), or that the
XQuery should be changed to allow *any* type-augmented infoset spec that
someone chooses to implement?
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 16:20:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:32 UTC