- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 12:14:16 -0500
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 11:53 AM, Joseph Reagle wrote: > Consequently, I disagree with this finding and prefer that the media > type > registration proceed as specified in RFC2048; a W3C specification SHOULD > reference the IETF document. I feel the same way. We're coming up against this problem in the RDF Core Working Group. I think it's silly to add seven pages of IETF boilerplate and registration information to our syntax specification. I think that our spec should simply reference the IETF registration and note the mime type that should be used. -- Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com]
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 13:14:17 UTC