On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, 5:10:43 PM, Brian wrote: BM> Norm, BM> 1) Can you confirm that the RDF practise of using qnames to represent URI BM> REF's is consistent with this finding. If so, you might like to mention BM> this in section 2. BM> 2) RDFCore has an outstanding issue to allow qnames as attribute values as BM> a shorthand for a URI REF. A URI ref is a single item. A qname is a tuple of URI and local name. I don't see that one can be a substitute for the other in the general case. For specific cases where the RDF assumption is valid that namespace URIs end with a # and that the URI reference formed by concatenating the namespace URI and the localname is a valid URI reference, you could make that equivalence. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.orgReceived on Thursday, 6 June 2002 08:31:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:41 GMT