- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 19:29:06 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>, www-tag@w3.org
At 12:47 05/06/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 10:10, Brian McBride wrote: >[...] > > 2) RDFCore has an outstanding issue to allow qnames as attribute values as > > a shorthand for a URI REF. This would mean that RDF would have attributes > > which allowed either a URI or a qname in the same attribute value. > > >I don't expect so. > >Rather, RDF would have one resource="..uri ref here..." >attribute, and one rdf:resourceQ="...qname here..." attribute. Good point. That's much cleaner. Brian
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 14:30:40 UTC