Re: Updated: issue qnameAsId-18

At 12:47 05/06/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 10:10, Brian McBride wrote:
>[...]
> > 2) RDFCore has an outstanding issue to allow qnames as attribute values as
> > a shorthand for a URI REF.  This would mean that RDF would have attributes
> > which allowed either a URI or a qname in the same attribute value.
>
>
>I don't expect so.
>
>Rather, RDF would have one resource="..uri ref here..."
>attribute, and one rdf:resourceQ="...qname here..." attribute.

Good point.  That's much cleaner.

Brian