- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 20:18:44 +0200
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- CC: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, www-tag@w3.org, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
On Monday, June 3, 2002, 7:45:30 PM, Tim wrote: TB> Keith Moore wrote: >> Still, I have no problem with raising the bar - my main point is that >> if you're going to complain about errors then you need to arrange for >> those complaints to go to somewhere that is useful. TB> What Keith said. I think this may be one of these things you could say TB> architecturally... along the lines of "future specifications MUST NOT TB> specify a default behavior of silent error/recovery fixup, and SHOULD TB> ensure that information about errors is routed to the parties who TB> (a) caused the error to occur, and TB> (b) have the capability of correcting the situation TB> noting that (a) and (b) may not be the same." TB> I think I'm beginning to believe there is a tractable architectural TB> issue here. -Tim If tractable issues are ones where we begin to see what finding might arise from them then, yes. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Monday, 3 June 2002 14:19:54 UTC