On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 20:00, Mark Baker wrote: > > Therefore, it is not useful to send something as application/xml unless > > the sender specifically wishes it to be processed as generic XML. > > Fair enough. So what if we define "generic XML" to include dispatch > to processors keyed on namespace declarations? Wouldn't that make > it more semantically significant? I think I'm going to write up an initial draft using Content-features for an xmlns feature, so we should have some "semantic significance" in a MIME-specific context to discuss shortly. Hopefully I'll have it written by end of day tomorrow - this doesn't look especially tough, at least for an initial draft. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.comReceived on Thursday, 17 January 2002 20:12:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:04 GMT