At 04:11 PM 17/01/02 -0500, Mark Baker wrote: >Almost exactly what I was thinking. My strawman media type was >application/xmlns-dispatch+xml (not very catchy, I know). None of the arguments I've read here lead me to see this as a value-add over application/xml. It seems we think that applications should when processing XML resources dispatch based on namespaces... except when they can't, which I guess is the point of the worry about XSLT. Before launching the quest for a new media type, I think we need a clearer explanation of the use case where this is used and application/xml or anything/anything+xml isn't appropriate, and why. -TimReceived on Thursday, 17 January 2002 18:25:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:04 GMT