W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Media types

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:53:00 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200201092253.RAA18348@markbaker.ca>
To: tbray@textuality.com (Tim Bray)
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> At 04:16 PM 09/01/02 -0500, Mark Baker wrote:
> >Q. 2; If custom media types are required, should there be any
> >commonality between them?
> I don't understand this question. -Tim

Sorry for being unclear.

For example, should all these custom XML types being registered be
required to use the RFC 3023 "+xml" convention?  If so, should all the
SHOULDs of section 7.1 be followed? etc..  The question isn't restricted
to RFC 3023 issues though.   There may be value to other common features
between types.

Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 17:52:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:29 UTC