W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2002

Re: My action item on RDDL/RDF

From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:58:50 -0500
Message-Id: <p04330108ba269f8416fb@[]>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>

At 10:49 AM -0800 11/11/02, Tim Bray wrote:

>Let's call it the RPV syntax.  It has two elements, R and PV.
>The simplest expression looks like this (let's assume 
><R r="/resources/rA">
>  <PV p="/properties/pA" v="/values/vA" />
>  </R>
>Don't even need to explain it.

I don't know if I'd go that far. IT's not at all obvious to me what R 
and PV are. I much prefer, long, verbose, fully spelled out names for 
elements, even if they take longer to type. (Can you tell I'm not a 
big user of instant messaging?)

Is R resource? Is PV "present value"? "property values"? There may be 
a very good idea here, but it's hard to tell amidst the 
abbreviations. :-(

| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 17:03:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:14 GMT