W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2002

Re: uri-comp draft necessary?

From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:11:31 -0500
Message-Id: <p04330100ba26244d23d5@[]>
To: WWW-Tag <www-tag@w3.org>

At 5:30 PM -0800 12/17/02, Tim Bray wrote:
>At several points during yesterday's TAG call, Dan claimed 
>repeatedly that URIs a and b are equivalent if (strcmp(a,b)==0) 
>equal, otherwise not, end of story.  If we believe this, we can 
>discard the uri-comp draft entirely right now and I won't put any 
>more work into editing it.  Do we believe this? -Tim

I'm willing to believe it for namespace names. I don't believe it for 
most other contexts. I think the uri-comp document is at least 
necessary to point this out.

| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 10:28:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:14 GMT