W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2002

Re: XML-*

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 12:23:46 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <87znrjkqn1.fsf@nwalsh.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com was heard to say:
| Again speaking  for myself, I don't think it deals with the other concerns 
| that make internal subsets and entities problematic in SOAP.  The note 
| from the XMLP group should go out soon, but in a nutshell, you still have 
| to deal with lots of buffer management issues and string rewriting issues 
| in a high performance parser, and I think one could make the case that all 

It seems to me that supporting the possibility of managing entities
should have little impact on performance for documents that don't have
any.

| of that opens you up a bit more to buffer overrun problems etc.  My own 
| concern is mainly with performance, and with the fact that having the 
| internal subset in there raises questions of how to propagate it through 
| SOAP intermediaries, etc. 

It'd have to be an attachment, I suppose. I would have thought that
was reasonably common, but I could be mistaken.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Resist the urge to hurry; it will only slow
XML Standards Architect | you down--Bruce Eckel
Web Tech. and Standards |
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE98N0iOyltUcwYWjsRAju3AKCo1mRcoOkBxg26TFo9knIZzJSVHgCfTwBl
WdZp8aItudutoGPqabmiDmo=
=+zQQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 12:25:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:14 GMT