The TAG accepted this issue at its 2 Dec 2002 teleconf. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#metadataInURI-31 The TAG's preliminary response is that URIs should not include metadata. The TAG accepted this issue to provide guidance on addressing the issues raised. From Ossi: To outline the following text, I'm actually suggesting (asking comments for) two rather practical things: 1. There should be a uniform way to declare version history of web resources (recommended by W3C)?, and more importantly 2. There should be a "clean", uniform way to refer to (and thus access) the metadata of web resources? Raised by, on behalf of Ossi Nykanen, himself Concerning Architecture Document, URIs Background and related + See Arch Doc, section 2.2 (.4 and .5) State (Raised, Accepted, Declined, Resolved, etc.) + 25 Nov 2002 Raised + 2 Dec 2002 Accepted Discussion history 2 Dec 2002 Assigned to None. -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 07:26:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:44 GMT