Re: Posted draft of URI comparison finding from Kian-Tat Lim on 2002-12-02 (www-tag@w3.org from December 2002)

From: Kian-Tat Lim <ktl@ktlim.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:34:44 -0800
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <58CD0DD6-061C-11D7-B1A0-000393BA3F7C@ktlim.com>

If "equivalent" describes two URIs that identify the same
resource, how can "http://example.com/intro#chap1" and
"http://example.com/intro" not be considered equivalent
unless fragments (with representation-defined semantics,
not URI-defined semantics) are considered to be resources?
If fragments are indeed to be considered as resources,
explicit mention of such should be made in the document.

-- 
Kian-Tat Lim, ktl@ktlim.com, UTF-7: +Z5de+pBU-

Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 12:36:26 UTC