Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > > At 11:40 AM -0700 8/19/02, Tantek Çelik wrote: > >> MOST.......................................LEAST >> MathML (X)HTML SVG XSLFO XML PNG > > > I don't believe this order. I think the line looks more like this: > > MOST.......................................LEAST > XML MathML (X)HTML SVG XSLFO PNG > > The only way to conclude that XHTML is more semantic is to ignore the > reality that most web pages are not just ordered paragraphs of text. All > HTML tells you is that something is a paragraph, a level 1 heading, a > table, monospaced, preformatted, and a few other things. > <SINGER>Madonna</SINGER> is more semantic than <SPAN>Madonna</SPAN>. > There is more useful information in the XML content, even without a DTD, > even without prior agreement, than there is in the HTML. The part I fail to understand is "even without agreement". How is that going to make more sense than a vocabulary that has agreed upon semantics such as MathML? Are we talking about a musician or about a sewing machine model? -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr> Research Engineer, ExpwayReceived on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 04:28:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:42 GMT