Re: storing info in XSL-FO: new issue? [was: Draft TAG Finding:...]

At 8:13 PM +0000 8/17/02, Ian Hickson wrote:

>Actually, much to my dismay (although that's another story) XHTML1 has
>achieved huge traction.

You have a very different definition of huge traction than I do. 
Outside the W3C web site I encounter almost no pages written invalid 
XHTML. Even more importantly I repeatedly notice that even the most 
recent browsers fail to handle basic XML techniques like CDATA 
sections and non-predefined entity and character references.

>>  If you want semantically tagged information, jump to pure XML
>
>XHTML1 _is_ pure XML.
>

By pure XML, I meant "make up your own vocabulary as you go" rather 
than using something that's been defined for you.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

Received on Sunday, 18 August 2002 08:50:53 UTC