RE: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review

On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 12:10, Williams, Stuart wrote:
[...]
> > But there is, I think, a fairly simple and appealing
> > architectural view in which http://example#foo
> > is in the same class as http://example, but
> > ../foo is in a very different class from
> > http://example#foo . Does this rendition of it appeal to you?
> 
> Well... maybe... its worth exploring a bit... but you've also introduced
> another troublesome word, 'class',

No, I just used it, with its ordinary meaning, in this discussion
with you. 'class' does not occur in

> >   introducing URIs [was: 13 Aug Arch Doc...]
> >   Dan Connolly (Tue, Aug 13 2002) 
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Aug/0138.html

[...]

> > Please take a look at my "introducing URIs" message to see
> > if it really looks like folly.
> 
> Next on my to do list... but that will be tomorrow (at the earliest).

'till then...

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/