- From: Steven Livingstone <s.livingstone@btinternet.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 14:00:09 +0100
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
This is the first time I have read this document and it was an interesting read - certainly answered a few questions :) One question I do have is about URIs - and it may not be right question for this arch primer. I feel that a section on architecting URI's may be useful. I say this as by design a URI can pretty much point to anything, and so to someone implementing this it can seem like there is no structure to them When implementing these in an enterprise for example, the "authority" would have to create and manage the URI(s). They would want to know about best design, versioning etc... indeed you give an example about how the W3C manages versioning etc. I feel this is an important point otherwise first time readers who do not fully understand Uri's may not have a clue how to use them... they could use practically anything for their URI. This is not a bad thing - I just think they may need guidance. Maybe in addition to the "tips on URI's" section, although I appreciate a proper doc would require its own space. Steven http://www.deltabis.net/steven/ -----Original Message----- From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ian B. Jacobs Sent: 13 August 2002 21:30 To: www-tag@w3.org Subject: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review Hello www-tag, The TAG invites your comments on the latest draft of the Architecture Document [1]. The TAG expects to publish a first public Working Draft (on the TR page) of the Architecture Document in a few weeks and would like material feedback on the current draft. The TAG does not commit to responding to every comment; this is not a formal call for review. The usual TAG policy [2] regarding email on this list is in effect. Please be concrete in your comments. Propose alternative language. Avoid sustaining long threads. Chapter 1 ("Identifiers and Resources") may deserve the most attention -- it has received a lot more attention from the TAG than the other chatpers. On the other hand, concrete suggestions for how to structure the other chapters could also help us improve the first public draft. Thank you, - Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0813-archdoc [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/#tag-attn -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 09:00:24 UTC