W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > August 2002

[Agenda] 12 Aug TAG teleconf (httpRange-14, xlinkScope-23)

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 10:54:07 -0400
Message-ID: <3D53D78F.30208@w3.org>
To: www-tag@w3.org


An agenda for the 12 August TAG teleconference
is available at HTML [1] and as text below.

  - Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/12-tag

Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

    [1]W3C [2]| TAG | Previous:[3]29 Jul | Next: 19 Aug

       [1] http://www.w3.org/
       [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
       [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/29-tag-summary

                  Agenda for 12 August 2002 TAG teleconference

    Nearby: [4]Teleconference details  [5]issues list  [6]www-tag

       [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
       [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
       [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/

    Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
    business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (15min)

     1. Confirm scribe
     2. Roll call. Regrets: DO, CL, NW
     3. Accept [7]29 July minutes
     4. Accept this [8]agenda
     5. Next meeting? Proposed 19 Aug.
     6. Confirm status of [9]completed actions
     7. Confirm status of [10]withdrawn actions [None]
     8. Any issues regarding September meeting arrangements?

       [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/29-tag-summary
       [8] http://www.w3.org/2002/08/12-tag

   1.2 Completed actions?

2. Technical (75min)

   2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document (45min)

    See also: [11]findings.
     1. [12]Architecture document
          1. Action DC 2002/07/08: Ask IESG when IETF decided not to use
             HTTP URis to name protocols. Awaiting reply.
          2. Action TBL: 2002/07/15: Create a table of URI properties.
          3. Action IJ 2002/07/08: Produce WD of Arch Doc. Harvest from
             [13]DanC's URI FAQ. Deadline 30 August.
     2. [14]Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use.
           + Action PC [15]2002/07/08: Propose alternative cautionary
             wording for finding regarding IANA registration. Refer to
             "[16]How to Register a Media Type with IANA (for the IETF
             tree) "

      [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
      [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0805-archdoc
      [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/ures14.html
      [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
      [15] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/08-tag-summary#media-types
      [16] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype

   2.2 Priority issues (30min)

     1. [17]httpRange-14: Need to make progress here to advance in Arch
     2. RFC3023Charset-21:
          1. Chris sent [18]information to www-tag. What is necessary to
             close this issue?
     3. Status of [19]URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of
        the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on [20]URI
        canonicalization and [21]email from Martin in particular. 
See more
        [22]comments from Martin.
          1. What should a finding look like for this?
     4. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query
           + ACTION DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue
             (bindings, query strings and schemas) to ensure that 
it's on
             their radar. See [23]discussions from 24 Jun TAG teleconf.
     5. [24]xlinkScope-23
          1. Priority of this?
     6. [25]augmentedInfoset-22:
           + [26]Request from Tim Bray to decide this issue 
(disposition =
             closed). Pushback from Simon St. Laurent.
           + ACTION DC 2002/06/17: Talk to XML Schema WG about PSVI.
             Report to tag, who expects to decide whether to add as an
             issue next week. DanC has sent email; awaiting reply 
from XML
             Scheme WG.
     7. [27]deepLinking-25
          1. Action PC 2002/07/22: Ask Henrik Frystyk Nielsen to provide
             us with a precis of the ruling. Done: awaiting reply from
     8. [28]uriMediaType-9: Status of negotiation with IETF? See
        [29]message from DanC.
           + Action TBL: Get a reply from the IETF on the TAG finding.

      [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#httpRange-14
      [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0323.html
      [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#URIEquivalence-15
      [20] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#canonicalization
      [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002May/0161
      [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0275.html
      [23] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/24-tag-summary.html#wsa-get
      [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xlinkScope-23
      [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#augmentedInfoset-22
      [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0159.html
      [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#deepLinking-25
      [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9
      [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Jun/0095.html

   2.3 New issues?


     Ian Jacobs, for TimBL
     Last modified: $Date: 2002/08/08 17:28:45 $
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 10:57:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:10 GMT