Re: Another whenToUseGet-7 counter-proposal

Mark Baker wrote:

> 
> I have a better proposal for you.  We have already addressed this issue
> in the XMLP WG;
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x133
> 
> The resolution to that should suffice for the TAG, IMO.

Huh?  As I read it, the conclusion of the XMLP WG was "Get lost.  We're
only going to define a POST binding."

What am I missing? -Tim