On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 08:30:52PM -0700, Tim Bray wrote: > I'm pretty much in agreement with all of Larry's points. I still think > that safe actions SHOULD use GET unless there are good reasons not to; > but I think that follows naturally. -Tim I agree with your observation Tim, but I'd prefer to see SHOULD-style language in there explicitly, rather than risk having people interpret it as MAY text. Architectural constraints should never be MAY. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.comReceived on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 00:05:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:40 GMT