W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2002

RE: FW: draft findings on Unsafe Methods (whenToUseGet-7)

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:51:13 -0500
Message-ID: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEEBF3@HQ5>
To: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@apache.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org 
Meaning the Web Architects believe it is a good idea 
and worthy of the W3C imprimatur so they accepted it?
SOAP doesn't need the W3C's stamp to thrive.  

If Internet systems need to bifurcate, let them. 

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@apache.org]

The only reason SOAP remains in the W3C for standardization is because
all of the other forums either rejected the concept out of hand or
refused to rubber-stamp a poor implementation of a bad idea.
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 17:51:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:50 GMT