>It worries me that we're almost done standardizing this thing >and still debating the right way to use it. You could argue >that the same was true for XML but the issue is much deeper >with SOAP. XML had an interoperable core that everyone could >agree upon. Err, namespaces? PIs? DTDs? ... > That is not true of SOAP. For most developers >"SOAP RPC over HTTP w/section 5 encoding" *is* the >interoperable core and yet for others (let's call them the >SOAP intelligencia), it is just a historical artifact. That >suggests to me that there is something fishy going on. ...and how is this different from the discussion of how to use HTTP even though HTTP has been around for a long time? In general I strongly encourage such discussion but quite frankly, as long as we are seeing this type of "shoot at anything that moves" arguments I am not sure how this can lead to anything constructive. Sigh HenrikReceived on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 13:49:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:50 GMT