On 2002-04-08 13:44, "ext Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote: >> Thus, putting the RDF in the XHTML header seems the >> optimal way to go. > > As the author of many, many, RDF-in-XHTML proposals, I submit > that this apporach is distasteful because it makes validation > basically impossible. ... > ... so changes may need to be made > to the XHTML specification. Well... I was actually thinking along the lines of evolving the XHTML spec to allow RDF in the header officially ;-) Of course, any kind of embedding of RDF in XHTML will require changes to the XHTML schema if you want to validate the instance, so I don't see how this can be avoided. Putting the RDF in the header seems a rather simple tweak and keeps avoids any confusion regarding whether RDF interleaved with XHTML content in the body needs to be displayed in some fashion. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Tuesday, 9 April 2002 03:58:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:40 GMT