> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com] <snip/> > So, we solicit input on how to handle this. Here are some > options: > > - Become ruthless and enforce a rule that all postings must > contain an issue number in the subject line or have a > subject line that says "New Issue Proposal for TAG" > - Try to restrict discussion to those issues that the TAG > plans to discuss at its next meeting - we'd have to publish > our agendas well in advance, but we think we can do that. > This model worked pretty well in the old XML IG. > - Drastically restrict posting rights to www-tag; either > to TAG members or to Invited Experts or by some other > criterion. I've been quietly lurking so as not to add to the noise level. I'd lean heavily toward #1. I'd be comfortable with #2 as a compromise so long as there is a mechanism for people to raise new issues, and not be solely restricted to those the TAG has decided in advance are up for discussion. I'd be very discouraged to see #3 adopted without giving #1 (or #2) a chance with admonishments to people to comply.Received on Monday, 1 April 2002 16:34:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:40 GMT