W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2001

Re: URIs versus URI references [was: My top two issues]

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:25:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200112180325.WAA03690@markbaker.ca>
To: connolly@w3.org (Dan Connolly)
Cc: www-tag@w3.org

> [in the hopes of being able to find these again in the future...]

Good idea, thanks.

Am I the only one who sees the irony in giving the issues their own
URIs?  8-)

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com

Received on Monday, 17 December 2001 22:26:21 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Orchard: "RE: TAG issues brainstorming"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "HTTP is not well understood [was: My top two issues]"
In reply to: Dan Connolly: "URIs versus URI references [was: My top two issues]"
Next in thread: Tim Bray: "Re: URIs versus URI references [was: My top two issues]"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:49 GMT