- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 00:21:19 -0400
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: Erik Dahlström <erik@xn--dahlstrm-t4a.net>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
Hi, Dirk– Fantasai wrote up the results from the discussion and wants the SVG WG to confirm that it matches what was agreed. Regards– –Doug On 10/2/15 12:14 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > >> On Oct 1, 2015, at 4:08 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, Dirk, Amelia, Cameron– >> >> We decided that we need (at least some of) you on the telcon to >> really deal with this issue and help move the CSS Writing Modes 3 >> spec to CR. >> >> Are you available to be on the telcon next week? > > I wonder what the issue is. I thought we resolved the last open > issues at the FX TF meeting in Paris a couple of weeks ago? fantasai > and Cameron were both it the meeting and overruled me :D. I myself > will not be able to join. > > Greetings, Dirk > >> >> Tav is going to be reviewing the spec in depth, and you can >> coordinate with him to provide feedback, if you can't be on the >> telcon. >> >> Thanks– –Doug >> >> On 9/30/15 9:58 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: >>> Hi, Erik– >>> >>> Can we please add the CSS Writing Modes 3 spec review to the >>> agenda? Fantasai says she needs our feedback on 2 issues (listed >>> below), and she's available to attend the telcon tomorrow to >>> explain the issue. >>> >>> (Fantasai, telcon details below in Erik's original agenda >>> email.) >>> >>> [[ I'm blocked on the SVGWG here: >>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-3/issues-cr-2014 >>> >>> Two issues require SVGWG review >>> >>> first one is >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Sep/0016.html >>> >>> That's the one that needs review of spec wording >>> >>> second issue is this >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Sep/0017.html >>> >>> The question on hand is whether we can fold 'writing-mode: rl' >>> and 'writing-mode: lr' together >>> >>> From a CSS perspective, they're the same >>> >>> The different values don't affect anything in the CSS model >>> >>> They're both horizontal writing modes, and the rl vs. lr doesn't >>> affect bidi >>> >>> But the SVG spec says they affect the "inline progression >>> direction" and I can't figure out what that means or should have >>> an effect on >>> >>> But it's quite clear that it doesn't affect reordering! >>> >>> There's a test file here >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Sep/att-0027/test.svg >>> >>> >>> which does very interesting things in Presto >>> >>> but otherwise renders the two values identically in Blink and >>> InkScape >>> >>> So, yeah, have fun with that? >>> >>> maybe someone in the group knows what the SVG spec was trying to >>> say, and whether or not it was important ]] >>> >>> Regards– –Doug >>> >>> On 9/30/15 4:46 PM, Erik Dahlström wrote: >>>> Please find the agenda for this week’s telcon below. >>>> >>>> Time: >>>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=10&day=1&year=2015&hour=20&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Phone: +1-617-324-0000 (access code: 649 040 824) >>>> IRC for minutes/discussion: #svg on irc.w3.org, port 6665 >>>> Agenda requests: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Agenda >>>> WebEx logistics: https://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/WebEx >>>> >>>> Agenda: >>>> >>>> * Path stroking for paths that end with tight curves (Tav) >>>> http://tavmjong.free.fr/blog/?p=1257 >>>> >>>> * Declarative animation and conformance >>>> https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/23 >>>> >>>> * SVG 2 chapter progress >>>> >>> >
Received on Friday, 2 October 2015 04:21:39 UTC