- From: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 08:29:49 +0900
- To: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com>
On 2015/06/05 3:50, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > We must not let perfect be the enemy of the good here. "Let's make a > new, better path syntax" is absolutely something we should do, but it > is *not* a short-term project. Agreed, but let's not conflate changing the syntax with freeing up the interpolation. > In the > meantime, we still can't animate paths in WebAnim, which is silly. Web Animations just uses the rules defined for interpolating the attributes its presented with--i.e. the matching segments behavior (which actually makes a bit more sense for a script API). So you can animate paths in Web Animations already. > Let's just promote the d attribute, come up with a property name for > it (not 'd'), and define the simple interpolation rules for it. We > can fix path at our leisure then. What's the urgency in pushing something into CSS that is basically unusable?
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 23:30:15 UTC