Re: hasFeature()

On 16/01/2014 12:39 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-domimplementation-hasfeature has a
> weird lifeline basically for SVG and an open issue related to that
> since it's not exactly clear what the details should be. Is SVG moving
> away from the fantastical feature testing world as well? Should we
> just simply always return true?

I don't think this has been considered good practice in the SVG 
community for at least a decade. It's worth a shot always returning true 
and seeing if that breaks anything.

Note that IndieUI had recently started using it but thankfully it was 
caught and removed. I reckon it's safe.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 12:05:03 UTC