- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:19:15 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Tavmjong Bah <tav.w3c@gmail.com>, "Smailus, Thomas O" <Thomas.O.Smailus@boeing.com>, Paul LeBeau <paul.lebeau@gmail.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Hello Tab, Thursday, April 17, 2014, 1:54:36 AM, you wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >> It does need to be specified (and already is, though apparently it >> needs to be made clearer). interpolation colourspace lets you choose >> between performing calculations in faster but inaccurate sRGB or in >> linear (not gamma companded) sRGB. > Isn't this already handled in an SVG-defined CSS property? Yes, that was half of my point. The other half is that apparently its less than obvious to some readers that its handled, so the spec text could use some clarification (probably in SVG2, perhaps an SVG 1.1 clarifying erratum also). And probably Images 4 needs to add one or more values to cover interpolation (for upsampling, rotation/skew and downsampling) where pixellation is not desired, and to point to interpolation-colorspace with some explanation. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 13:19:17 UTC