- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:04:54 -0800
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > 2) Furthermore, a shorthand can not have its “own” syntax. It can only inherit the syntax of one of the longhand. Following the rules of CSS, we would need to introduce a new longhand property taking the values of the current ’stroke’ property. Slight clarification: it can have its own syntax, but it must decompose into longhand properties. That is, a shorthand is *defined* solely by the values of the longhand properties it decomposes into. But yes, your conclusion is right - the current value of 'stroke' would have to move into a longhand, probably 'stroke-color' or something. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 02:05:42 UTC