- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 03:27:31 -0700
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- CC: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
On Jun 7, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:54:57 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Please remove the definition of SVGElement#style and replace it with >> something like: >> >> [[ >> If the user agent supports styling with CSS, the following IDL applies: >> >> SVGElement implements ElementCSSInlineStyle; >> ]] > > I've now put this in CSSOM instead, as suggested by Hixie (for HTML). > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/ca20cc414744 > > When you want to integrate with CSSOM, just remove the style IDL attribute > and reference CSSOM. Awesome. Can you please file a bug on the W3C bug tracker so that we don't miss the change? There should be a category for SVG2. I would vote for remove .style from SVG but would like to see CSSOM in a more stable state first. Greetings, Dirk > >> and reference CSSOM. >> >> This should make .style in SVG be the same as .style in HTML, defined in >> one place. The suggested wording would make the attribute absent if CSS >> is not supported. >> >> Also see >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21848 >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21849 >> >> cheers > > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 10:28:11 UTC