- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:12:20 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Jan 24, 2013, at 5:03 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: >> Tab, In your mail to www-style you mention points and then defining it to >> take [ <length> | <percentage> ]#. points, as well as x/y/dx/dy on text >> content elements, currently use comma-wsp separation (white space or comma >> with optional white space). Is it deliberate that the property would >> require commas, whereas the presentation attribute would not? I haven't >> thought about it hard enough to have an opinion on whether that is the right >> way to go. > > Ugh, I forgot about that. I guess we could define the grammar as > "[<length> | <percentage>] [ ,? [<length> | <percentage>] ]*". I'd > prefer if we were indeed able to switch over to CSS's conventions, but > if not, the grammar is doable. It might be ok to require commas on CSS. That is what we do on basic shapes (polygon() function ) for exclusions and clip-path. Alternatively we relax the syntax there as well. Greetings, Dirk > > ~TJ >
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 15:12:54 UTC