W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > February 2013

[Bug 21062] Reference to outdated [WINDOW]

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:16:07 +0000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-21062-2017-WQxYRroTl0@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21062

--- Comment #5 from Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The W3C's restrictions on normative refs do not exclude WHATWG references.

You seem to misunderstand my point. I have nothing against a WHATWG spec
reference. But the content and links should be as much as possible stay
consistent for the lifetime of a level of a spec. Both is not necessarily the
case for a WHATWG spec which changes daily. For the same reason, we should not
reference an editors draft of the W3C either.

PS: Should is not meant to be the SHOULD according to RFC2119 :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 18:16:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:54 GMT