W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: [svg2] radialGradient @fr constraints

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:50:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDB-SczSpefBrJ152Tm+PtzDsGt7JwRPBnXk2nq6tkNTPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jasper van de Gronde <th.v.d.gronde@hccnet.nl>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Very nice!
You could also call out that if the focus goes outside the circle, the
gradient no longer fills the entire path.

Rik

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jasper van de Gronde <
th.v.d.gronde@hccnet.nl> wrote:

> On 2012-08-30 12:44, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote:
>
>> And if it is allowed to set fx,fy outside the circle, fr positive or
>> negative, one still needs to define the effect for spreadMethod as already
>> mentioned. Because this is already problematic, if the point is on the
>> circle, do you have any idea about a meaningful behaviour of spreadMethod,
>> if fx,fy is outside and not corrected? spreadMethod seems to be only
>> simple, if there is not selfintersection of the gradient. Olaf
>>
> I have written a blog post on how one can look at radial gradients, and
> the effect of having the focus on or outside the circle:
>
> http://jaspervdg.wordpress.**com/2012/09/03/specifying-**radial-gradients/<http://jaspervdg.wordpress.com/2012/09/03/specifying-radial-gradients/>
>
> I have included several examples and diagrams, but if there is still
> anything that is unclear, feel free to say so and I'll update it.
>
> The post also gives some suggestions for dealing with the instability that
> occurs when the focus (zero-radius point in my post) is on the circle.
>
>
Received on Monday, 3 September 2012 19:51:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:52 GMT