W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: solidColor

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 03:09:55 -0700
To: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
CC: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2AF03EDE-0EFD-416C-BAF2-B723885045E3@adobe.com>
I am definitely not opposed to that, but iirc we had some discussions where people had concerns for viewers without CSS support. Those viewers might not make use of this functionality.

Dirk

Sent from my iPhone

On May 18, 2012, at 12:10 PM, "Alex Danilo" <alex@abbra.com> wrote:

> +1
> 
> It has limited usefulness, and is a bit of a pain to implement.
> 
> Alex
> 
> --Original Message--:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
>> 
>> Although I think the usefulness of the <solidColor> element will be reduced once CSS Variables gets some uptake, I realise we have already resolved to include it in SVG2.
>> 
>> Can't we unresolve it?
>> 
>> 
>> Rob
>> -- 
>> “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. ... If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others?" [Matthew 5:43-47]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 10:10:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:51 GMT