W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Agenda request for CSS3 Transform and transform-origin syntax

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:21:37 -0800
To: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5DDD8075-E5B0-4F72-B3B1-6C71CECD9B92@adobe.com>
Sorry, this mail should go to www-style not www-svg.

Dirk

On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I want to add a new agenda item for the CSS WG call tomorrow: "CSS3 Transform and transform-origin syntax"
> 
> There was a discussion on www-style[1] about the syntax of transform-origin recently. The discussion didn't reach to a conclusion. Because this is a blocking issue for the 2d part of the spec, it should have a high priority.
> 
> To summarize the topic:
> 
> Should 'transform-origin' have the same syntax like 'background-position'.
> 
> If yes, how do we behave on the 3D part of transform-origin? 2D part can have up to 4 arguments. Add a slash after the 2d part that separates it from the 3d translation (a length value)? Add a new property for 3D translation named transform-origin-z that takes a length value?
> 
> If not, can calc() be used to combine arguments the same way as it is possible for 'background-position' '' (i.e. calc(top 10px))? Should transform-origin just support up to 3 arguments for horizontal, vertical and z translation?
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Dirk
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 20:22:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:50 GMT