W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > July 2012

Re: mask: luminance or alpha

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:36:45 -0700
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
CC: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AD59FB2E-64F4-4BDF-B9C6-996C52C84A2E@adobe.com>
Everything comes to a good end :)

Dirk

On Jul 31, 2012, at 4:33 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com> wrote:
> (2012/08/01 8:25), Rik Cabanier wrote:
>     Brian wasn't suggesting to change <mask>.  He was saying that we're
>     stuck with the <mask> element defaulting to luminance, and the <image>
>     type defaulting to alpha,
> 
> That is not what his spec is saying. Source can be anything, images as
> well as vectors.
> 
> Yes, but I wasn't proposing we change the behaviour when the source is a <mask> element. We all agree, we can't change that.
> 
> What I was suggesting we could change is that last sentence, i.e. when the source is not a <mask> element. So I'm sure we agree here.
> 
>  
> yes, I think we're all in agreement. 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 23:37:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:51 GMT